The Boys is back for its fourth season and is still joyfully (and violently) pricking the pomposity of superhero perfection says John Caro for The Conversation.
In contrast to the noble tales of Marvel and DC superheroes, The Boys imagines a world where superheroes don鈥檛 just use their powers to save the day but abuse them for influence and control. It鈥檚 the mission of the titular Boys, a dysfunctional anti-superhero group to undermine these 鈥渟upes鈥, known as The Seven, and the company that owns and manages them, Vought International.
Based on the comic book , the TV adaptation is back for its fourth season and is still joyfully (and violently) pricking the pomposity of superhero perfection.
The original comic wore its Quentin Tarantino-esque influence on its sleeve. Although diluted, the extreme cartoonish violence, often played for laughs, has followed through to the small-screen adaptation. The season three recap is a testament to this, all exploding heads, bestiality and gleefully ejaculated expletives.
The Boys also features the , which can feel at odds with its treatment of disturbing contemporary issues such as QAnon-inspired conspiracists and child soldiers.
It鈥檚 the sort of show that refuses to be pinned down. For instance, it ridicules the impact of corporate meddling in creative endeavours, producing bland Hollywood films and vacuous musicals, but then includes a brazen Amazon (where the show is streamed) product placement.
It鈥檚 thoughtful in its representation of gay relationships, yet exhibits a sniggering approach to the Supe characters involved in non-heteronormative sexual practices. Still, all is fair game if it鈥檚 masked by the protective veneer of a knowing wink, right?
Besides, maybe that鈥檚 missing the point. This is a show of contradictions. The clash of diverse sensibilities provides an energy that drives the premise 鈥 it鈥檚 all about the frequent uncomfortable tonal shifts between horror and poignancy, comedy and misery. If the gears occasionally crunch, then all the better.
Season four鈥檚 first few episodes continue on this crunching. We join The Boys mid-mission, undercover at an election night party.
Set six months after the events of season three, there have been changes in the world of The Boys. In addition to the election of President Robert Singer (Jim Beaver) and Vice President Serena Neuman (Claudia Doumit), The Boys have come in from the cold and are operating under the auspices of the CIA.
Episode one starts with The Boys mid-mission, undercover at an election night party. To the strains of The Sex Pistols鈥 God Save The Queen, corrupt Vice-President-elect and secret super Neuman takes to the stage to celebrate, accompanied by Johnny Rotten snarling, 鈥減otential H-bomb鈥 she ain鈥檛 no human being鈥 鈥 The Boys could never be accused of being subtle.
That is largely what the first three episodes of season four of The Boys are about 鈥 artifice versus obscured depths. Like the soulless grin plastered across Neuman鈥檚 face, surfaces can鈥檛 be trusted. And like a superhero鈥檚 mask, they obscure the truth and distort reality. In the twisted media-dominated world of The Boys, superheroes are not so much symbols but brands, used to promote whatever hollow product or ideology the politicians and corporations see fit.
As well as covertly supporting Neuman鈥檚 rise to power, Homelander, the chilling antagonist and Supe leader of the Vought corporation and The Seven, is on trial for the murder of a protester. 鈥淭hat鈥檚 a formality,鈥 he tells Neuman, recalling that he could commit murder and not lose votes.
While it鈥檚 great to return to old favourites 鈥 disgraced former team leader Billy Butcher (Karl Urban) is back 鈥 much of the enjoyment of this new season lies in the introduction of new Supes and their powers. As showrunner Eric Kripke : 鈥淭hese new Supes are some of the best and craziest ever written for The Boys. You are going to love them. And by love, I mean be absolutely horrified and a tiny bit nauseous.鈥
Sage (Susan Heyward) is perhaps the most intriguing of the new characters. Her power is simply her mind 鈥 she is the most intelligent being on Earth. In a running gag, she constantly calls out anyone identifying her as the world鈥檚 most intelligent woman: 鈥淧erson,鈥 she wearily corrects.
She is continually ignored, including when she objects to the addition of 鈥渟ister鈥 to her super name by Vought, because of its racist associations. We are left wondering why would an intelligent black woman willingly work with a bigoted organisation.
I look forward to the answer being provided in the remaining episodes of the season, hopefully with typical gear-crunching and inappropriate style.
, Principal Lecturer,
This article is republished from under a Creative Commons license. Read the .
More articles from The Conversation...
The Premier League is tweaking the rules to keep things competitive 鈥 and VAR is staying too
Christina Philippou
10 June 2024
3 minutes
Why American investors are pouring money into European football
Christina Philippou
5 June 2024
5 minutes
Should Ukraine attack Russian territory with western weapons? The debate in Nato is shifting
23 May 2024
5 minutes